jueves, 8 de mayo de 2008

SHOULD YOU USE CHLORINE IN LIQUID, SOLID OR GAS FORM, WHEN TREATING WATER ??

Application Bulletin
Bulletin 3001
Cost Comparison
Chlorine Gas vs. Hypochlorite
Cost per pound of AVAILABLE CHLORINE:
Gas Chlorine - is 100% pure, elemental chlorine which maintains its strength indefinitely.
Average cost per pound is $0.45‡. Since it is pure chlorine, the cost per pound of AVAILABLE CHLORINE = $0.45/lb.
Powder Chlorine (Calcium Hypochlorite) - contains a maximum of 70% available chlorine.
Strength is rapidly lost in storage. Average cost per pound of powder chlorine is $1.23‡. Therefore, the cost per
pound of AVAILABLE CHLORINE = $1.76/lb.
Liquid Bleach (Sodium Hypochlorite) - contains approximately 10% † available chlorine.
Strength is rapidly lost in storage. Average cost per gallon is $1.29‡. One gallon weighs approximately 9 lbs. The
cost of 1 lb. of bleach is calculated at $1.29 / 9 = $0.143. At 10% strength the average cost per pound of
AVAILABLE CHLORINE is determined as $0.143 X 10 lbs. bleach = $1.43/lb
‡ Costs are average quotes from suppliers in Ft. Pierce, Florida metropolitan area, Nov. 1993. Costs may vary in
your area, but the relative differences in costs of the three types of chlorine tend to remain consistant.
† (Note: Most manufacturers of Sodium Hypochlorite will only guarantee a 10% chlorine strength in 16% solution,
due to loss of strength in shipment and storage.)

A study was carried on the use of these three alternatives on a base usage from 1 Lb to 100 Lb each day, between 100 and 350 days. The results for all of them showed that liquid bleach is the most expensive alternative, followed by the powder and having the gas as the much lower cost between them. However the use and dosage of gas can be very delicate and dangerous.

No hay comentarios:

Vistas de página en total

GREEN CHEMICALS

The Green Seal certification is granted by the organization with that name and has a great number of members contributing with the requirements to pass a raw material or a chemical product as "green". Generally for a material to be green, has to comply with a series of characteristics like: near neutral pH, low volatility, non combustible, non toxic to aquatic life, be biodegradable as measured by oxygen demand in accordance with the OECD definition.
Also the materials have to meet with toxicity and health requirements regarding inhalation, dermal and eye contact. There is also a specific list of materials that are prohibited or restricted from formulations, like ozone-depleting compounds and alkylphenol ethoxylates amongst others. Please go to http://www.greenseal.com/ for complete information on their requirements.
For information on current issues regarding green chemicals, see the blog from the Journalist Doris De Guzman, in the ICIS at: http://www.icis.com/blogs/green-chemicals/.
Certification is an important — and confusing — aspect of green cleaning. Third-party certification is available for products that meet standards set by Green Seal, EcoLogo, Energy Star, the Carpet & Rug Institute and others.
Manufacturers can also hire independent labs to determine whether a product is environmentally preferable and then place the manufacturer’s own eco-logo on the product; this is called self-certification. Finally, some manufacturers label a product with words like “sustainable,” “green,” or “earth friendly” without any third-party verification.
“The fact that there is not a single authoritative standard to go by adds to the confusion,” says Steven L. Mack M.Ed., director of buildings and grounds service for Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
In www.happi.com of June 2008 edition, there is a report of Natural formulating markets that also emphasises the fact that registration of "green formulas" is very confused at present, due to lack of direction and unification of criteria and that some governmental instittion (in my opinion the EPA) should take part in this very important issue.