martes, 24 de junio de 2014

CLEANING ADVISE

Understanding The Differences Between Cleaning Chemicals

By Lisa Ridgely


Cleaning, sanitizing and disinfecting surfaces are daily tasks for custodial workers — but how likely is it that front-line workers know the uses for each chemical and understand the differences between them? 

Product manufacturers and jan/san distributors agree that knowing the difference between cleaning, sanitizing and disinfecting as applied to chemicals can be confusing. For that reason, custodial managers are encouraged to offer refresher training regularly.


Clean To Remove Soil

“Cleaning” as a noun encompasses all sorts of tasks; in fact, it is used to describe the entire industry, as well as the chores most Americans perform in their homes. But by examining the true meaning of the word as it applies to the chemical science of soil and germ removal, it becomes clear how important cleaning is to public health.One chemical manufacturer in Illinois commented that, cleaning chemicals are designed to remove soil. Any impact they have on the population of microorganisms is generally the result of the removal of that soil. The bottom line function to using cleaners is to remove visible debris, dirt and dust from a surface — an essential first step in any cleaning program. 

Of course, there are different types of cleaners for different types of soil. Some cleaners — those of which are on the alkaline end of the pH scale — remove greases and oils. Then there are acid-based cleaners, which are used to remove water scales and minerals. Between those two extremes are neutral cleaners used for lighter soils.From degreasers and descalers to all-purpose and glass cleaners, these chemicals are commonly used on surfaces such as counters, desks, tables, walls and floors. Thorough cleaning, spray bottles and laundered or disposable towels or mops and diluted cleaning solutions in buckets, may be the only step in a cleaning application — or it may be just the first step. 

Managers should stress to their staff that cleaning is an essential step in the removal of substances from surfaces. Only after cleaning chemicals have been used — and only in certain applications — sanitizing and disinfecting should follow.

Sanitizing and disinfecting are recommended for surfaces that are touched frequently by hands or skin or that come into contact with bacteria, urine, fecal matter or bloodborne pathogens. Common applications for sanitizers and disinfectants include food service, healthcare, educational, fitness and other public facilities such as airports and shopping malls. Specifically, these chemicals are typically used in restrooms, kitchen/break rooms and on touch points.

Sanitizers are designed to reduce or kill 99.9 to 99.999 percent of listed bacterial micro-organisms on — and this is important — pre-cleaned surfaces. For surfaces where sanitizers are needed, managers can choose between two general products: food contact sanitizers and non-food contact options. 

According to product manufacturers, food-contact sanitizers are part of a three step process. First, staff cleans the surface, it is rinsed and then the sanitizer is applied. These chemicals are most commonly used in food service areas on meat slicers, cutting boards and food prep tables — surfaces that come into contact with food.

“Sanitizers are generally associated with food service, where workers must reduce the micro-organisms to a level that is safe,” says Glenn Rothstein, president of Bio-Shine Inc. in Spotswood, N.J. 

To accomplish this, managers train staff on chemical dwell times, which vary between sanitizers and disinfectants. 

Although product advancements are entering the marketplace regularly, traditionally, sanitizer dwell times are considerably shorter than those for disinfectants, which can be up to 10 minutes.  Rothstein says that workers using sanitizers can accomplish safe levels of surface micro-organisms in 30 seconds to one minute, although some products take 5 minutes.

Non-food contact sanitizers are used in two steps. First, the surface needs to be cleaned, then it is sanitized. These sanitizers are available but not widely used, say manufacturers, mainly because sanitizers have no anti-viral claims, offering no confidence of killing the flu or other viruses found on surfaces. 

“When you sanitize, you are killing/reducing the bacteria on that surface, but doing nothing about viruses and fungus,” says one Wis.-based chemical manufacturer. “Sanitizing is better than cleaning alone, but the reduction of pathogen populations on surfaces is exponentially better when you use disinfectants.” - See more at: http://www.cleanlink.com/hs/article/When-Is-It-Important-To-Sanitize--16774#sthash.ZkkrsJ14.dpuf

For applications in which there are heavy soil loads, cleaning is an essential first step before disinfecting against bacteria. But in facilities where budget cuts loom and time matters, unless heavy soils are present, Rothstein suggests forgoing the cleaning step and skipping right to disinfection.

Manufacturers stress that not all disinfectants are created equal and it is important for custodial managers to do their research before purchasing. Choose a disinfectant that is most appropriate for the application. The product label should specify areas where the product is most effective, as well as appropriate dwell times to meet kill claims.

This makes label-reading crucial to choosing the right product. Disinfectants will list the types of microorganisms they are effective against, including:
• Bacteria such as E. Coli, listeria, salmonella, MRSA and, in some cases, C. diff
• Viruses such as norovirus, influenza strains, HIV and Hepatitis B and C
• Mold and mildew
• Fungi such as Athlete’s Foot

“Disinfection works by destroying the cell wall of microbes or interfering with the metabolism,” Rothstein says. “There are several types: phenolics, quats and silvers. The phenolics are the oldest form of disinfectants, but are harsh and rarely used today. Quats are the mainstream disinfectants that everyone is using these days, and kill times can vary.”

On a pre-cleaned surface, most quat disinfectants have a 10-minute kill claim. But as products evolve and demand for more efficient cleaning times grow, manufacturers have developed disinfectants with kill claims as little as one minute.

Silver disinfectants are the newest types, featuring extended kill times as a result of a residual film left behind. Those extended kill times can reach 24 hours — though Rothstein says he’s seen a claim of nearly a month on one silver.

No matter which disinfectant is used, it is important to focus on high-touch surfaces to prevent the spread of bacteria. Touch points will vary by facility, but traditionally include door handles, phones, light switches, elevator buttons, vending machines, refrigerator doors, microwave buttons and handles, and faucets and flush handles.

Disinfectant can be applied using a spray bottle, left to dwell and then wiped off with a cloth. Disinfecting wipes can be used. They can make the job more convenient because the cloths are already pre-soaked in disinfectant chemical, but these wipes often have different dwell times, so it is important that managers train staff accordingly.
- See more at: http://www.cleanlink.com/hs/article/Disinfecting-Fights-Bacteria-And-Infections--16775#sthash.oaDo3KtU.dpuf
Disinfecting best practices include proper dilution, appropriate tool use and safety considerations. That means managers should not only be educating staff about the differences between cleaners, sanitizers and disinfectants, but they should also be making sure protocol is being followed. 

Manufacturers recommend departments use dilution control systems. These wall-mounted systems are one of the easiest ways to ensure the proper ratio of chemical to water is being used every time. 

Workers should know how ratios work, and the differences in dilution between the containers they use. For instance, custodial staffs should be trained to understand that not as much chemical will go into a spray bottle as will be put into a mop bucket. Managers can guarantee this by training workers on the dilution control system, how it works and how to change the dials on the device to reflect the cleaning needs.

In departments where dilution systems are not being used, distributors recommend custodial managers supply staff with ready-to-use or pre-packaged chemical products. 

“Ready-to-use products are great on high-touch surfaces,” says Rothstein. “The ready-to-use chemical is a very effective way to guarantee workers are using the proper dilution to clean and disinfect. Plus, these products can be very convenient and can save on worker productivity.”

Using the proper tools — such as personal protective equipment and color-coded cloths or disposable paper towels — for the job is also very important, because it not only improves efficacy but it reduces the chances of cross-contamination.


Know Your Occupants

With so many chemicals on the market, the decision-making process involves knowledge of the type of surfaces that need to be cleaned, as well as the type of occupants in a facility. 

“It’s important to understand what the product will and won’t kill and what the efficacy is. Managers should choose products based on the application,” says Rothstein. “For example, a hospital will use one type of disinfectant and a vet clinic will most likely use a different one — one that combats dangerous and contagious viral infections such as parvovirus.” 

Also, managers should be aware that some infection threats may not be communicated. In a hospital, for example, HIPAA laws might prevent facilities from releasing information about the types of illnesses or viruses occupants are suffering. Custodial departments should anticipate that certain viruses and bacteria may be present, and clean accordingly.

The rules can vary drastically, depending on what type of facility is being serviced, Rothstein says. Some facilities, like schools and government institutions, are subject to strict government regulations that dictate the types of cleaning, sanitizing and disinfecting products to be used. 

“When you evaluate your cleaning program, you need to understand all the variables in the equation,” he says.  
- See more at: http://www.cleanlink.com/hs/article/Training-On-Proper-Use-Of-Chemicals--16776#sthash.01Kky2cc.dpuf

martes, 10 de junio de 2014

Anatomy of a glove: Knit, dip and fibers

Gloves are one of the most important safety gear to wear in our job.
The correct  choice is what makes it very helpful.
Knit gloves are made on knitting machines with a limited range of needle density. Thick gloves made from large yarns are generally knit on machines of 8-10 gauge (8-10 needles per inch). These yarns are the same size you find in winter coats. Larger yarns require larger needle spacing. Many high cut level gloves (level 4-5) use these large yarns and 8-10 gauge knits. For finer and thinner knit gloves, the most common knitting style is 13 needles per inch. The 13-gauge knits often use small yarns such as 210 denier nylon. This is about the size of the yarn used in an oxford shirt.

Openness in knit fabric

Knitting machine gauge and yarn size control how open the glove textile will be. For 13-gauge knits, for example, using a 210 denier yarn, there is perhaps a 30-40 percent open area in the textile. The percentage of openness in the knit affects how the glove feels and how much stretch it has. Most users would agree that more open knits result in cooler, more comfortable and dexterous gloves. The downside of more open knits is that it is much harder to create high cut level gloves with small yarns with open space.

The knit needs to work with the dip

Most users like the grip and durability that palm-coated knit gloves offer. Knit gloves with high levels of openness have an additional benefit for dipping and coating. With high open area, the dip coating can penetrate the textile and encapsulate the yarn on the palm of the glove. The dip can be nitrile, polyurethane or NR latex. When the dip can penetrate the knit, the coating has the best possible attachment to the textile.
For comfortable gloves with good dexterity, the coating and the knit must be thin, no more than 2-4 mm thickness in total. For this type of thin coating layer to be durable, it must be well supported by the textile. The rubber in the coating does not have good tear strength. The yarn in the glove provides the reinforcement to prevent premature failure of the coating layer.
When the knit works with the dip you can build a thin, comfortable, durable glove.

Fibers

A common mistake in glove selection is picking the wrong fiber type. As you will find from the descriptions below, fibers are not all created equal.
Polyester is perhaps the most widely used synthetic fiber. It is low in cost and available in many sizes and types. Moderate tensile strength and low cut performance limit the protection from this material used alone. Polyester yarn in its textured form has good abrasion for its price point. Chemical resistance is broad, however polyester is a moderate temperature fiber with a burn and drip risk. This material is useful as a blending fiber for controlling the cost of a composite yarn.
Nylon is the second most widely used synthetic fiber. Nylon has moderate tensile strength and low cut. Nylon has really standout abrasion resistance, which makes it very useful in gloves. The military has used nylon in combination with cotton for Battle Dress Uniforms (BDUs) and other garments for many years. Like polyester, nylon is an excellent choice for glove components. It is slightly more expensive than polyester but higher in durability. Nylon has moderate temperature resistance and a burn and drip risk if used by itself. Chemical resistance is lower than polyester.
Para-Aramid fiber is aromatic nylon. The fiber is strong but small filament size limits its performance for light knit gloves. High tensile strength with small filaments make this a better puncture material than a cut product. Cut level 4 and 5 gloves need a high density knit fiber cover. These high cover knits are bulky and not very comfortable. Para-aramids are high temp materials and have excellent flame performance. But they have iffy chemical performance; acids and chlorine bleach are big trouble for these materials. One last caution, Para-Aramid fibers are not good for abrasion. Gloves made from these fibers should have a coating or a cover glove.
Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) is significantly stronger than the Para-Aramids. They offer good cut performance and excellent chemical resistance to most common compounds. These materials can only handle about 220ºF and start to fail at just slightly higher temperatures. Because UHMWPE is polyethylene, it is very low friction. This makes UHMWPE a poor choice for puncture resistance. Also, UHMWPE will burn and has a bad melt drip issue.
Liquid Crystal Polyester (LCP) material has tensile strength between UHMWPE and Para-Aramid. LCP is a large denier per filament fiber and has very good cut. Because LCP is Aromatic Polyester it is also a high temp fiber. LCP fiber is resistant to most industrial chemistry and has some flame resistance. LCP is better all around in abrasion than either Para-Aramid or UHMWPE. Bear in mind that abrasion and durability in gloves is a complex topic and this review is a summary. The combination of large filament, tensile, chemical resistance, high temp and abrasion make LCP a strong competitor. It provides great combination performance in cut and puncture applications.
Fiberglass is just glass, and it is fragile. Fiberglass does not do well in abrasion or in flex. The damaged surface of fiberglass yarn has sharp ends of broken filament exposed, and this filament can cause skin irritation. However fiberglass is very hard when compared to all the organic fibers we have talked about. Fiberglass is harder than most cutting tools. The glass fiber breaks down the cutting edge of the threat and gives good cut resistance. As long as the fiberglass has a protective cover of one of the other fibers on the list, it is a tough, high-cut fiber. Fiberglass has great thermal resistance and will not burn. Chemical resistance is uneven.
Stainless steel fiber, like fiberglass, is a specialty item used in combination with one of the other fibers. This fiber has all the properties of steel: hardness, toughness and stiffness. It also has good thermal and chemical resistance. However, as this material is used in a blend, these properties are only as useful as the total performance of the blended yarn. To address the stiffness of steel, these fibers are a low denier per filament and this limits the performance to some degree.

Vistas de página en total

GREEN CHEMICALS

The Green Seal certification is granted by the organization with that name and has a great number of members contributing with the requirements to pass a raw material or a chemical product as "green". Generally for a material to be green, has to comply with a series of characteristics like: near neutral pH, low volatility, non combustible, non toxic to aquatic life, be biodegradable as measured by oxygen demand in accordance with the OECD definition.
Also the materials have to meet with toxicity and health requirements regarding inhalation, dermal and eye contact. There is also a specific list of materials that are prohibited or restricted from formulations, like ozone-depleting compounds and alkylphenol ethoxylates amongst others. Please go to http://www.greenseal.com/ for complete information on their requirements.
For information on current issues regarding green chemicals, see the blog from the Journalist Doris De Guzman, in the ICIS at: http://www.icis.com/blogs/green-chemicals/.
Certification is an important — and confusing — aspect of green cleaning. Third-party certification is available for products that meet standards set by Green Seal, EcoLogo, Energy Star, the Carpet & Rug Institute and others.
Manufacturers can also hire independent labs to determine whether a product is environmentally preferable and then place the manufacturer’s own eco-logo on the product; this is called self-certification. Finally, some manufacturers label a product with words like “sustainable,” “green,” or “earth friendly” without any third-party verification.
“The fact that there is not a single authoritative standard to go by adds to the confusion,” says Steven L. Mack M.Ed., director of buildings and grounds service for Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
In www.happi.com of June 2008 edition, there is a report of Natural formulating markets that also emphasises the fact that registration of "green formulas" is very confused at present, due to lack of direction and unification of criteria and that some governmental instittion (in my opinion the EPA) should take part in this very important issue.