martes, 23 de abril de 2013

Gas Hazard Definitions and Data

Facts At Your Fingertips
April 1, 2013

Gas Hazard Definitions and Data

The detection of gases in plant environments has a critical and wide-ranging role in the chemical process industries (CPI). Among the major applications of gas detection are limiting personnel exposure to hazardous chemicals, preventing explosive atmospheres, protecting the environment and identifying leaks in process equipment. Table 1 summarizes the main reasons for gas monitoring.
All CPI workers should be conversant with gas-detection terms to promote safety, health and environmental quality. The following is a collection of terms and data involving hazardous gases (Table 2).
PEL (permissible exposure limit). Set by OSHA to limit workers’ exposure to an airborne substance, PELs are based on an eight-hour time-weighted average. PELs are enforceable legal limits.
TLV (threshold limit value). Established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, TLVs are based on known toxicity of chemicals in humans or animals, and are recommendations, rather than legal limits.
IDLH (immediately dangerous to life and health). Defined in the U.S. by the National Institute for Industrial Safety and Health (Part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) as a level of exposure that is likely to cause death or immediate or delayed permanent adverse health effects
LC50 (median lethal concentration). A measure of the toxicity of a surrounding medium that will kill half of a sample population of test animals in a specified period through exposure via inhalation.

Oxygen deficiency

Normal ambient air contains 20.8 vol.% oxygen. When oxygen concentration dips below 19.5 vol.% of the total atmosphere, the area is considered oxygen deficient. Oxygen deficiency may result from O2 being displaced by other gases, such as carbon dioxide, and can also be caused by rust, corrosion, fermentation or other forms of oxidation that consume oxygen. Table 3 outlines the physiological effects of oxygen deficiency by concentration.
If oxygen concentrations in the air rise above 20.8%, the atmosphere is said to be oxygen-enriched. Higher oxygen levels can increase the likelihood and severity of a flash fire or explosion, because the oxygen-enriched atmosphere tends to be less stable than air.
Table 1. summary of the main reasons for gas monitoring.
Type of monitoringPurposeHazardPossible source of hazard
Personal protectionWorker safetyToxic gasesLeaks, fugitive emissions, industrial process defects
ExplosiveWorker safety and facility safetyExplosionsPresence of combustible gases and vapors due to leaks or process defects
EnvironmentalEnvironmental safetyEnvironmental degradationAcid gas emissions
Industrial processProcess controlProcess malfunctionProcess errors
Source: MSA
Table 2. Exposure data for selected hazardous gases
Chemical and formulaPropertiesOSHA PEL (ppm)IDLH (ppm)LC50 (ppm)
Ammonia (NH3)Corrosive, flammable503004,000
Boron trifluoride (BF3)Toxic125806
Bromine (Br2)Highly toxic, corrosive, oxidizer0.13113
Carbon monoxide (CO)flammable501,2003,760
Carbon dioxide (CO2) 5,00040,000Not available
Chlorine (Cl2)Toxic, corrosive, oxidizer110293
Chlorine dioxide (ClO2)Toxic, oxidizer0.15250
Ethylene oxide (C2H4O)Flammable18004,350
Hydrogen chloride (HCl)corrosive5502,810
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)Toxic, flammable20100712
Methyl isocyanate (CH3NCO)Highly toxic, flammable0.02322
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)Highly toxic, oxidizer520115
Phosphine (PH3)Highly toxic, pyrophoric0.35020
Sulfur dioxide (SO2)Corrosive51002,520
Table 3. Physiological effects of oxygen deficiency by degree
Concentration of O2 in atmosphere, vol. %Physiological effect
19.5 to 16No visible effect
16 to 12Increased breathing rate; accelerated heartbeat; Impaired attention, thinking and coordination
14 to 10Faulty judgment and poor muscular coordination; Muscular exertion, causing rapid fatigue; Intermittent respiration
10 to 6Nausea and vomiting; Inability to perform vigorous movement or loss of the ability to move; Unconsciousness, followed by death
Below 6Difficulty breathing; convulsive movements; death in minutes
Source: MSA

Combustible atmospheres

Vapor and gas. Although these two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, they are not identical. Vapor refers to a substance that, though present in the gaseous phase, generally exists as a liquid or solid at ambient temperatures. Gas refers to a substance that generally exists as a gas at room temperature.
Vapor pressure and boiling point. Vapor pressure can be defined as the pressure exerted by a vapor in thermodynamic equilibrium with its condensed or solid form. Vapor pressure is directly related to temperature, and along with boiling point, determines how much of a chemical is likely to become airborne. Substances with low vapor pressures generally present less of a hazard because there are fewer molecules of the substance to ignite, but they may require higher-sensitivity instrumentation to detect.
Vapor density. Vapor density is the weight ratio of a volume of vapor compared to an equal volume of air. Most flammable vapors are heavier than air, so they may settle in low areas.
Explosive limits. To produce a flame, a sufficient amount of gas or vapor must exist. But too much gas can displace the oxygen in an area, making it unable to support combustion. Therefore, there is a window of concentrations for flammable gas concentrations where combustion can occur. The lower explosive limit (LEL) indicates the lowest quantity of gas required for combustion, while the upper explosive limit (UEL) indicates the maximum quantity of gas (Table 4). Gas LELs and UELs can be found in NFPA 325. LELs are typically 1.4 to 5 vol.%. As temperature increases, less energy is required to ignite a fire and the percent gas by volume required to reach the LEL decreases, increasing the hazard. An environment with enriched oxygen levels raises the UEL of a gas, and the rate of flame propagation. Mixtures of multiple gases add complexity, so their exact LEL must be determined by testing.

References

1. U.S. Dept. of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR 1910.1000 Table Z-1.

2. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg. Accessed March 2013.

3. Mine Safety Appliances Co., “Gas Detection Handbook” 5th ed. MSA Instrument Div., August 2007.

4. National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 325: Guide to Fire Hazard Properties of Flammable Liquids, Gases and Volatile Solids, 1994.

No hay comentarios:

Vistas de página en total

GREEN CHEMICALS

The Green Seal certification is granted by the organization with that name and has a great number of members contributing with the requirements to pass a raw material or a chemical product as "green". Generally for a material to be green, has to comply with a series of characteristics like: near neutral pH, low volatility, non combustible, non toxic to aquatic life, be biodegradable as measured by oxygen demand in accordance with the OECD definition.
Also the materials have to meet with toxicity and health requirements regarding inhalation, dermal and eye contact. There is also a specific list of materials that are prohibited or restricted from formulations, like ozone-depleting compounds and alkylphenol ethoxylates amongst others. Please go to http://www.greenseal.com/ for complete information on their requirements.
For information on current issues regarding green chemicals, see the blog from the Journalist Doris De Guzman, in the ICIS at: http://www.icis.com/blogs/green-chemicals/.
Certification is an important — and confusing — aspect of green cleaning. Third-party certification is available for products that meet standards set by Green Seal, EcoLogo, Energy Star, the Carpet & Rug Institute and others.
Manufacturers can also hire independent labs to determine whether a product is environmentally preferable and then place the manufacturer’s own eco-logo on the product; this is called self-certification. Finally, some manufacturers label a product with words like “sustainable,” “green,” or “earth friendly” without any third-party verification.
“The fact that there is not a single authoritative standard to go by adds to the confusion,” says Steven L. Mack M.Ed., director of buildings and grounds service for Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
In www.happi.com of June 2008 edition, there is a report of Natural formulating markets that also emphasises the fact that registration of "green formulas" is very confused at present, due to lack of direction and unification of criteria and that some governmental instittion (in my opinion the EPA) should take part in this very important issue.