jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2013

Scale Build Up in Water Pipes


Trans Pipeline buildup on the pipe walls with scale can result in reduced flow and cause problems in processes downline.

 


 

PE Buyers Guide U.S. industry spends billions of dollars annually to control and remove the limescale that builds up in industrial equipment such as heat exchangers, evaporative coolers, boilers, chillers or other water-fed equipment. Oil wells, for example, face significant scaling problems from the highly mineralized water extracted with the oil. Limescale not only increases downtime, maintenance costs and causes the early renewal of capital equipment but also increases energy usage. Scale prevention can benefit industrial water users by minimizing or eliminating unexpected production shutdowns and by offering substantial savings to end users through water conservation.
Types of fouling
Scale usually refers to an intimate mixture of sparingly soluble mineral salts. Mineral scale deposition occurs because of heat transfer or pressure changes. Calcium carbonate scaling from hard water, and calcium phosphate and oxalate formation in sugar refineries are examples. Other types of fouling include the growth of algae and bacteria (bio-fouling), the consolidation of loose particles (particulate fouling, i.e. corrosion by-products), and the accumulation of “coke” like deposits (e.g. chemical reaction fouling).
What can go wrong?
Calcium carbonate is the predominant component of the hard and tenacious scale deposit from water and is particularly apparent in processes involving heat transfer. A concentration of dissolved solids by repeated partial evaporation of the water is the main factor that causes calcium carbonate scale. Even soft water will eventually form scale when concentrated numerous times.

Process, maintenance and facility managers should be concerned about scale deposition. Deposits create an insulating layer on heat transfer surfaces. An estimated 40 percent more energy is needed to heat water in a system fouled with 1/4 inch of limescale. This leads to more power consumption or to the installation of heavier duty, more expensive heat exchangers to compensate. Scaled boiler tubes mechanically fail because of overheating and cooling tower plates can collapse due to the weight of scale deposits. Erosion damage can occur due to scale particles breaking loose and subsequently impinging upon other surfaces.
Pipework scale reduces the available cross-section area, and fluids are affected by increased pipe wall friction. A larger, more power-consuming pump will be required to maintain throughput volumes but this may allow only a temporary solution to the problem. A plant that needs to be shut down for cleaning loses money.
The formation of a thin uniform layer of scale or wax can temporarily reduce steel corrosion but eventually stagnant conditions develop under the deposit and electrochemical reactions will corrode the steel surfaces. The result can be fluid leaks and equipment failure, which are potentially very dangerous. In the food industry, the incorporation of even undesirable trace particulates can lead to off-flavors or off-colors, reducing shelf life, or even making the product unsalable.
Not only are plant and product integrity at risk but also personnel health and safety may be compromised. Fouled safety valves or emergency process sensors may not operate in an emergency. Overheated boilers have been known to explode. Failure to control bacterial growth in cooling water can create conditions hazardous to health (e.g. production of Legionella pneumophila) or, in anaerobic conditions, may allow the production of toxic hydrogen sulfide from sulfate reducing bacteria.
Recognizing fouling
Because scales and other deposits generally form inside closed systems, it is not always evident that deposition is occurring. Nevertheless, some clues can provide the necessary evidence. It is useful to try to answer the following questions:
Are energy/heating bills reduced immediately after cleaning the plant? 
Is it necessary to arrange significant planned and/or unplanned downtime? 
Are heat exchangers performing below design? 
Is corrosion a problem in the plant? 
Are there signs of unexpected deposit formation within the system?

The more times the answer is “yes,” the more likely it is that there is fouling. If fouling can be controlled, there is the potential to save energy, prevent equipment failure and reduce maintenance. Furthermore, a successful treatment strategy will maintain fluid flow, reduce corrosion effects and provide a safer environment – in addition to saving money.
Solving the problem
A process audit would identify the extent of the current problem, the point in the system corresponding to initial fouling, and most useful, why there is a problem. From the evidence collated, it may be possible to suggest a solution without the need for expensive external control measures. Minor changes in the process temperature, pressure, pH or fluids composition could significantly reduce the fouling potential at practically no cost.

Treatment options include inhibitor chemicals, descalers, ion exchange, physical cleaning such as pipeline pigging, or the installation of permanent magnets, or electronic devices such as the patented Scalewatcher computerized electronic water conditioner.
Chemical methods
Although it is usually possible to find a chemical solution to a fouling problem, ever increasing environmental and safety pressures demand that chemical consumption be reduced wherever possible. Increasingly, restrictions are being applied regarding the use of chemicals, due to their environmental impact. However it has proven to be the best solution to keep the systems clean. If the scale has develop, there is a need to descale with an acid solution; then it is usually neutralized, and the system replenished with water and a close loop additive incorporated, to maintain the pH in conditions as to prevent scale formation again, and to keep rust and oxidation out. As a rule of thumb, if scale build up is the problem, the pH of the solution should be kept lower than 7, if the problem is corrosion, then the pH of the solution should be above 8.
Physical methods
A range of physical methods can be used to remove fouling deposits. Water jetting, sand or plastic-bead blasting can be used in accessible locations. Such methods are expensive and can cause abrasion of surfaces.
Magnetic and electronic
Unlike other preventative techniques, electronic descaling devices do not stop precipitation but alter the shape of the crystals to reduce the adherence and build-up of deposits on the pipe wall.

No hay comentarios:

Vistas de página en total

GREEN CHEMICALS

The Green Seal certification is granted by the organization with that name and has a great number of members contributing with the requirements to pass a raw material or a chemical product as "green". Generally for a material to be green, has to comply with a series of characteristics like: near neutral pH, low volatility, non combustible, non toxic to aquatic life, be biodegradable as measured by oxygen demand in accordance with the OECD definition.
Also the materials have to meet with toxicity and health requirements regarding inhalation, dermal and eye contact. There is also a specific list of materials that are prohibited or restricted from formulations, like ozone-depleting compounds and alkylphenol ethoxylates amongst others. Please go to http://www.greenseal.com/ for complete information on their requirements.
For information on current issues regarding green chemicals, see the blog from the Journalist Doris De Guzman, in the ICIS at: http://www.icis.com/blogs/green-chemicals/.
Certification is an important — and confusing — aspect of green cleaning. Third-party certification is available for products that meet standards set by Green Seal, EcoLogo, Energy Star, the Carpet & Rug Institute and others.
Manufacturers can also hire independent labs to determine whether a product is environmentally preferable and then place the manufacturer’s own eco-logo on the product; this is called self-certification. Finally, some manufacturers label a product with words like “sustainable,” “green,” or “earth friendly” without any third-party verification.
“The fact that there is not a single authoritative standard to go by adds to the confusion,” says Steven L. Mack M.Ed., director of buildings and grounds service for Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
In www.happi.com of June 2008 edition, there is a report of Natural formulating markets that also emphasises the fact that registration of "green formulas" is very confused at present, due to lack of direction and unification of criteria and that some governmental instittion (in my opinion the EPA) should take part in this very important issue.