sábado, 26 de febrero de 2011

CHEMISTRY AND MUSCLES

Nitric Oxide

Researchers have recently determined that nitric oxide is a critical player in your body's creation of new muscle cells, and the science behind nitric oxide is surprisingly straightforward: Nitric oxide relaxes the smooth muscle cells around your blood vessels, widening the inner walls of your arteries. This process enhances nutrient and oxygen delivery to your muscles, boosting strength and endurance while working to prevent fatigue.

Unfortunately, your body doesn't create enough nitric oxide on its own to produce the results you want. That's why supplementing your body's natural supply of nitric oxide is a critical component of muscle building success. Nitric oxide supplements are used by tens of thousands of professional athletes and bodybuilders, and millions of average men.

The impact of nitric oxide cannot be understated. It's essential, and without a nitric oxide boost, your workouts are suboptimal, no matter what other steps you are taking.

What Now?

First and foremost, start eating right and working out properly. Without that foundation, nothing else you do will make a difference. Second, start taking a nitric oxide supplement daily. Doing so will allow you to transform your body in ways you have only dreamed.

There are so many nitric oxide products on the market today, and so many confusing marketing messages, it's tough to choose the right one – the one that makes the most sense for you.

Most nitric oxide supplements are similar enough that it wouldn't matter which you used, but some are notably different. Force Factor, for example, has been shown more than any other product on the market to start working immediately to increase muscle gains. It's more expensive than some of the alternatives, but it's also the most effective, so the additional cost is justified (wasting your money on cheaper products that don't work is senseless, we believe). And unlike many of its competitors, the company behind Force Factor knows what it's doing when it comes to developing phenomenal products.

No hay comentarios:

Vistas de página en total

GREEN CHEMICALS

The Green Seal certification is granted by the organization with that name and has a great number of members contributing with the requirements to pass a raw material or a chemical product as "green". Generally for a material to be green, has to comply with a series of characteristics like: near neutral pH, low volatility, non combustible, non toxic to aquatic life, be biodegradable as measured by oxygen demand in accordance with the OECD definition.
Also the materials have to meet with toxicity and health requirements regarding inhalation, dermal and eye contact. There is also a specific list of materials that are prohibited or restricted from formulations, like ozone-depleting compounds and alkylphenol ethoxylates amongst others. Please go to http://www.greenseal.com/ for complete information on their requirements.
For information on current issues regarding green chemicals, see the blog from the Journalist Doris De Guzman, in the ICIS at: http://www.icis.com/blogs/green-chemicals/.
Certification is an important — and confusing — aspect of green cleaning. Third-party certification is available for products that meet standards set by Green Seal, EcoLogo, Energy Star, the Carpet & Rug Institute and others.
Manufacturers can also hire independent labs to determine whether a product is environmentally preferable and then place the manufacturer’s own eco-logo on the product; this is called self-certification. Finally, some manufacturers label a product with words like “sustainable,” “green,” or “earth friendly” without any third-party verification.
“The fact that there is not a single authoritative standard to go by adds to the confusion,” says Steven L. Mack M.Ed., director of buildings and grounds service for Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
In www.happi.com of June 2008 edition, there is a report of Natural formulating markets that also emphasises the fact that registration of "green formulas" is very confused at present, due to lack of direction and unification of criteria and that some governmental instittion (in my opinion the EPA) should take part in this very important issue.